Posts Tagged ‘American Chemical Society’

Questions about the (metadata) components of a scientific article.

Monday, April 8th, 2019

The conventional procedures for reporting analysis or new results in science is to compose an “article”, augment that perhaps with “supporting information” or “SI”, submit to a journal which undertakes peer review, with revision as necessary for acceptance and finally publication. If errors in the original are later identified, a separate corrigendum can be submitted to the same journal, although this is relatively rare. Any new information which appears post-publication is then considered for a new article, and the cycle continues. Here I consider the possibilities for variations in this sequence of events.

The new disruptors in the processes of scientific communication are the “data“, which can now be given a separate existence (as FAIR data) from the article and its co-published “SI”. Nowadays both the “article+SI” and any separate “data” have another, mostly invisible component, the “metadata“. Few authors ever see this metadata. For the article, it is generated by the publisher (as part of the service to the authors), and sent to CrossRef, which acts as a global registration agency for this particular metadata. For the data, it is assembled when the data is submitted to a “data repository”, either by the authors providing the information manually, or by automated workflows installed in the repository or by a combination of both. It might also be assembled by the article publisher as part of a complete metadata package covering both article and data, rather than being separated from the article metadata. Then, the metadata about data is registered with the global agency DataCite (and occasionally with CrossRef for historical reasons).‡ Few depositors ever inspect this metadata after it is registered; even fewer authors are involved in decisions about that metadata, or have any inputs to the processes involved in its creation.

Let me analyse a recent example.

  1. For the article[1] you can see the “landing page” for the associated metadata as https://search.crossref.org/?q=10.1021/acsomega.8b03005 and actually retrieve the metadata using https://api.crossref.org/v1/works/10.1021/acsomega.8b03005, albeit in a rather human-unfriendly manner.† This may be because metadata as such is considered by CrossRef as something just for machines to process and not for humans to see!
  2. Citation #22 in the above does have its own metadata record, obtainable using: 
    https://data.datacite.org/application/vnd.datacite.datacite+xml/10.14469/hpc/4751

    • This has an entry
      <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsReferencedBy">10.1021/acsomega.8b03005</relatedIdentifier>
      which points back to the article.[1]
  3. To summarise, the article noted above[1] has a metadata record that does not include any information about the references/citations (apart from an ambiguous count). A human reading the article can however can easily identify one citation pointing to the article data, which it turns out DOES have a metadata record which both human and machine can identify as pointing back to the article. Let us hope the publisher (the American  Chemical  Society) corrects this asymmetry in the future; it can be done as shown here![2]

For both types of metadata record, it is the publisher that retains any rights to modify them. Here however we encounter an interesting difference. The publishers of the data are, in this case, also the authors of the article! A modification to this record was made post-publication by this author so as to include the journal article identifier once it had been received from the publisher,[1] as in 2 above. Subsequently, these topics were discussed at a workshop on FAIR data, during which further pertinent articles[3], [4], [5] relating to the one discussed above[1] were shown in a slide by one of the speakers. Since this was deemed to add value to the context of the data for the original article, identifiers for these articles were also appended to the metadata record of the data.

This now raises the following questions:

  1. Should a metadata record be considered a living object, capable of being updated to reflect new information received after its first publication?
  2. If metadata records are an intrinsic part of both a scientific article and any data associated with that article, should authors be fully aware of their contents (if only as part of due diligence  to correct errors or to query omissions)?
  3. Should the referees of such works also be made aware of the metadata records? It is of course enough of a challenge to get referees to inspect data (whether as SI or as FAIR), never mind metadata! Put another way, should metadata records be considered as part of the materials reviewed by referees, or something independent of referees and the responsibility of their publishers?
  4. More generally, how would/should the peer-review system respond to living metadata records? Should there be guidelines regarding such records? Or ethical considerations?

I pose these questions because I am not aware of much discussion around these topics; I suggest there probably should be!

‡Actually CrossRef and DataCite exchange each other’s metadata. However, each uses a somewhat different schema, so some components may be lost in this transit. †JSON, which is not particularly human friendly.

References

  1. A. Barba, S. Dominguez, C. Cobas, D.P. Martinsen, C. Romain, H.S. Rzepa, and F. Seoane, "Workflows Allowing Creation of Journal Article Supporting Information and Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR)-Enabled Publication of Spectroscopic Data", ACS Omega, vol. 4, pp. 3280-3286, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03005
  2. S. Arkhipenko, M.T. Sabatini, A.S. Batsanov, V. Karaluka, T.D. Sheppard, H.S. Rzepa, and A. Whiting, "Mechanistic insights into boron-catalysed direct amidation reactions", Chemical Science, vol. 9, pp. 1058-1072, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7sc03595k
  3. T. Monaretto, A. Souza, T.B. Moraes, V. Bertucci‐Neto, C. Rondeau‐Mouro, and L.A. Colnago, "Enhancing signal‐to‐noise ratio and resolution in low‐field NMR relaxation measurements using post‐acquisition digital filters", Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 57, pp. 616-625, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.4806
  4. D. Barache, J. Antoine, and J. Dereppe, "The Continuous Wavelet Transform, an Analysis Tool for NMR Spectroscopy", Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 128, pp. 1-11, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1997.1214
  5. U.L. Günther, C. Ludwig, and H. Rüterjans, "NMRLAB—Advanced NMR Data Processing in Matlab", Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 145, pp. 201-208, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.2000.2071

Tags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Chemical IT | No Comments »

Open Access journal publishing debates – the elephant in the room?

Sunday, November 4th, 2018

For perhaps ten years now, the future of scientific publishing has been hotly debated. The traditional models are often thought to be badly broken, although convergence to a consensus of what a better model should be is not apparently close. But to my mind, much of this debate seems to miss one important point, how to publish data.

Thus, at one extreme is COAlition S, a model which promotes the key principle that “after 1 January 2020 scientific publications on the results from research funded by public grants provided by national and European research councils and funding bodies, must be published in compliant Open Access Journals or on compliant Open Access Platforms.” This includes ten principles, one of which “The ‘hybrid’ model of publishing is not compliant with the above principles” has revealed some strong dissent, as seen at forbetterscience.com/2018/09/11/response-to-plan-s-from-academic-researchers-unethical-too-risky I should explain that hybrid journals are those where the business model includes both institutional closed-access to the journal via a subscription charge paid by the library, coupled with the option for individual authors to purchase an Open Access release of an article so that it sits outside the subscription. The dissenters argue that non-OA and hybrid journals include many traditional ones, which especially in chemistry are regarded as those with the best impact factors and very much as the journals to publish in to maximise both the readership, hence the impact of the research and thus researcher’s career prospects. Thus many (not all) of the American Chemical Society (ACS) and Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) journals currently fall into this category, as well as commercial publishers of journals such as Nature, Nature Chemistry,Science, Angew. Chemie, etc. 

So the debate is whether funded top ranking research in chemistry should in future always appear in non-hybrid OA journals (where the cost of publication is borne by article processing charges, or APCs) or in traditional subscription journals where the costs are borne by those institutions that can afford the subscription charges, but of course also limit the access.  A measure of how important and topical the debate is that there is even now a movie devoted to the topic which makes the point of how profitable commercial scientific publishing now is and hence how much resource is being diverted into these profit margins at the expense of funding basic science.

None of these debates however really takes a close look at the nature of the modern research paper. In chemistry at least, the evolution of such articles in the last 20 years (~ corresponding to the online era) has meant that whilst the size of the average article has remained static at around 10 “pages” (in quotes because of course the “page” is one of those legacy concepts related to print), another much newer component known as “Supporting information” or SI♥ has ballooned to absurd sizes. It can reach 1000 pages[1] and there are rumours of even larger SIs. The content of SI is of course mostly data. The size is often because the data is present in visual form (think spectra). As visual information, it is not easily “inter-operable” or “accessible”. Nor is it “findable” until commercial abstracting agencies chose to index it. Searches of such indexed data are most certainly “closed” (again depending on institutional purchases of access) and not “open access”. You may recognise these attributes as those of FAIR (Findable, accessible, inter-operable and re-usable). So even if an article in chemistry is published in pure OA form, in order to get FAIR access to the data associated with the article, you will probably have to go to a non-OA resource run by a commercial organisation for profit. Thus a 10 page article might itself be OA, but the full potential of its 1000+ page data (an elephant if ever there was one) ends up being very much not OA.

You might argue that the 1000+ pages of data does not require the services of an abstracting agency to be useful. Surely a human can get all the information they want from inspecting a visual spectrum? Here I raise the future prospects of AI (artificial intelligence). The ~1000 page SI I noted above[1] includes e.g NMR spectra for around 70 compounds (I tried to count them all visually, but could not be certain I found them all). A machine, trained to identify spectra from associated metadata (a feature of FAIR), could extract vastly more information than a human could from FAIR raw data‡ (a spectrum is already processed data, with implied information/data loss) in a given time. And for many articles, not just one. Thus FAIR data is very much targeted not only at humans but at the AI-trained machines of the future.

So I again repeat my assertion that focussing on whether an article is OA or not and whether publishing in hybrid journals is to be allowed or not by funders is missing that 100-fold bigger elephant in the room. For me, a publishing model that is fit for the future should include as a top priority a declaration of whether the data associated with it is FAIR. Thus in the Plan-S ten principles, FAIR is not mentioned at all. Only when FAIR-enabled data becomes part of the debates can we truly say that the article and its data are on its way to being properly open access.

‡The FAIR concept did not originally differentiate between processed data (i.e. spectra) and the underlying primary or raw data on which the processed data is based. Our own implementation of FAIR data includes both types of data; raw for machine reprocessing if required, and processed data for human interpretation. Along with a rich set of metadata, itself often created using carefully designed workflows conducted by machines.

♥The proportion of articles relating to chemistry which do not include some form of SI is probably low. These would include articles which simply provide a new model or interpretation of previously published data, reporting no new data of their own. A famous historical example is Michael Dewar’s re-interpretation of the structure of stipitatic acid[2] which founded the new area of non-benzenoid aromaticity.

References

  1. J.M. Lopchuk, K. Fjelbye, Y. Kawamata, L.R. Malins, C. Pan, R. Gianatassio, J. Wang, L. Prieto, J. Bradow, T.A. Brandt, M.R. Collins, J. Elleraas, J. Ewanicki, W. Farrell, O.O. Fadeyi, G.M. Gallego, J.J. Mousseau, R. Oliver, N.W. Sach, J.K. Smith, J.E. Spangler, H. Zhu, J. Zhu, and P.S. Baran, "Strain-Release Heteroatom Functionalization: Development, Scope, and Stereospecificity", Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 139, pp. 3209-3226, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b13229
  2. M.J.S. DEWAR, "Structure of Stipitatic Acid", Nature, vol. 155, pp. 50-51, 1945. https://doi.org/10.1038/155050b0

Tags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Chemical IT | 2 Comments »

Molecule of the year (month/week)?

Monday, December 12th, 2016

Chemical and engineering news (C&EN) is asking people to vote for their molecule of the year from six highlighted candidates. This reminded me of the history of internet-based “molecules of the moment“. It is thought that the concept originated in December 1995 here at Imperial and in January 1996 at Bristol University by Paul May and we were joined by Karl Harrison at Oxford shortly thereafter. Quite a few more such sites followed this concept, differentiated by their time intervals of weeks, months or years. The genre is well suited for internet display because of plugins or “helpers” such as Rasmol, Chime, Jmol and now JSmol which allow the three dimensions of molecular structures to be explored by the reader. Here I discuss a second candidate from the C&EN list; a ferrocene-based Ferris wheel[1],[2] (DOI for 3D model: 10.5517/CCDC.CSD.CC1JPKYQ) originating from research carried out at Imperial by Tim Albrecht, Nick Long and colleagues.

The chemical interest was the redox chemistry of the six metal centres, and the interactions between these centres, expressed more succinctly as “do the iron centres talk to each other?”. The suggestion was that the charges in the molecules originating from oxidation move between ferrocene centres at a rate that is fast compared to the electrochemical timescale. An analogy is drawn to the nanoscale and uniformly charged conductive rings.

I was interested to compare this system with any similar Fe compounds that might also be known in the CSD (Cambridge structure database). Here are some that I found:

  1. CEFDOG[3] with two cyclic ferrocene units with both neutral Fe and Fe(+) present
  2. EZEVIO[4], 3D: 10.5517/CC805N2  with Fe and Ge as the metals.
  3. FULVFE[5] from 1969 with two Fe centres.
  4. PETTUD and PETVAL[6] with two Fe centres.
  5. PETVEP and PETVIT[6] with Fe and Zr centres
  6. URAFUQ and URAGAX (3D: 10.5517/CCDC.CSD.CC1JPKZR), the system shown above.
  7. VOKXOI[7] with one Fe and one Fe+.
  8. VOKXUO[7] with one Fe and one Co+.
  9. WOJDOQ[8], 3D : 10.5517/CC133PGC from 2014 with three Fe units.
  10. ZECTOQ[9] with one Fe and one Th.

Returning to the communication between ferrocene units, the six-unit ferris wheel noted above has four sets differentiated from the other two in the solid state, although in solution by NMR they are all seen as equalised by exchange. The twist angle between four pairs is ~47° (C-C distance 1.471Å) and for the other two it is ~18° (C-C distance 1.466Å) which allows a fair measure of π-π conjugation to operate between the rings. Contrast this with the smaller WOJDOQ[10], where the torsions between the rings are closer to 80° (C-C distance 1.486Å) thus inhibiting π-π conjugation. It would certainly be interesting to compare e.g. the cyclic voltammetry for these two species to see if electronic communication between the rings is affected by this structural difference.

WOJDOQ

In regard to the D3-symmetric WOJDOQ[10], this is of course chiral and here its chiroptical properties intrigue,‡ along with questions of whether the two enantiomers are configurationally stable at room temperatures. If so, perchance they might be capable of acting as asymmetric catalysts?

Finally I speculate whether these sorts of rings can be constructed as Möbius strips or perhaps even as trefoil knots. It is certainly nice to see new molecules that spark all sorts of interesting new ideas!

‡The calculated optical rotation of WOJDOQ (TPSSh/6-311G(d,p)/SCRF=dichloromethane) is 427° at 800 nm and 1077° at 589 nm (doi: 10.14469/hpc/1971); the VCD (ωB97XD/6-311G(d,p)/SCRF=dcm) is shown below (doi: 10.14469/hpc/1970);

the  ECD (doi: 10.14469/hpc/1972 ):

References

  1. M.S. Inkpen, S. Scheerer, M. Linseis, A.J.P. White, R.F. Winter, T. Albrecht, and N.J. Long, "Oligomeric ferrocene rings", Nature Chemistry, vol. 8, pp. 825-830, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2553
  2. Inkpen, Michael S.., Scheerer, Stefan., Linseis, Michael., White, Andrew J.P.., Winter, Rainer F.., Albrecht, Tim., and Long, Nicholas J.., "CCDC 1420914: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination", 2016. https://doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc1jpkyq
  3. M. Hillman, and A. Kvick, "Structural consequences of oxidation of ferrocene derivatives. 1. [0.0]Ferrocenophanium picrate hemihydroquinone", Organometallics, vol. 2, pp. 1780-1785, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1021/om50006a013
  4. M. Joudat, A. Castel, F. Delpech, P. Rivière, A. Mcheik, H. Gornitzka, S. Massou, and A. Sournia-Saquet, "Synthesis, Structures, and Reactivity of Mono- and Bis(ferrocenyl)-Substituted Group 14 Metallocenes", Organometallics, vol. 23, pp. 3147-3152, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1021/om0400393
  5. M.R. Churchill, and J. Wormald, "Crystal and molecular structure of bis(fulvalene)diiron", Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 8, pp. 1970-1974, 1969. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50079a030
  6. P. Scott, U. Rief, J. Diebold, and H.H. Brintzinger, "ansa-Metallocene derivatives. 28. Homo- and heterobimetallic bis(fulvalene) complexes from bis(cyclopentadienyl)- and bis(indenyl)-substituted ferrocenes", Organometallics, vol. 12, pp. 3094-3101, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1021/om00032a036
  7. P. Brüggeller, P. Jaitner, and H. Schottenberger, "Kristallographische Gegenüberstellung der Monokationen von Bis(fulvalen)dieisien und Bis(fulvalen) eisen-cobalt mit identischem Gegenion (PF6−)", Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 417, pp. C53-C58, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-328x(91)80206-y
  8. R. Shekurov, V. Miluykov, O. Kataeva, A. Tufatullin, and O. Sinyashin, "Crystal structure of cyclic tris(ferrocene-1,1′-diyl)", Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online, vol. 70, pp. m318-m319, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1107/s1600536814017346
  9. P. Scott, and P.B. Hitchcock, "Synthesis, structure and electrochemistry of the first fulvalene derivative of an actinide", Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 497, pp. C1-C3, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-328x(95)00108-3

Tags:, , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in crystal_structure_mining, Interesting chemistry | 2 Comments »

(Hyper)activating the chemistry journal.

Monday, September 7th, 2009

The science journal is generally acknowledged as first appearing around 1665 with the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in London and (simultaneously) the French Academy of Sciences in Paris. By the turn of the millennium, around 10,000 science and medical journals were estimated to exist. By then, the Web had been around for a decade, and most journals had responded to this new medium by re-inventing themselves for it. For most part, they adopted a format which emulated paper (Acrobat), with a few embellishments (such as making the text fully searchable) and then used the Web to deliver this new reformulation of the journal. Otherwise, Robert Hooke would have easily recognized the medium he helped found in the 17th century.

In 1994, a small group of us thought that one could, and indeed should go further than emulated paper. We argued [1] that journals should be activated by delivering not merely the logic of a scientific argument, but also the data on which it might have been based. Of course, we encountered the usual problem; doing this might cost publishers more in production resources, and in the absence of a market prepared to pay the extra, the business model did not make sense (to the publishers). Well, 15 years later, and most publishers are indeed now thinking about how their journals can be enhanced. A number of interesting projects (the RSC’s Project Prospect is one which strives to bring science alive) have emerged. Another is the topic of this blog; the activation of the journal with molecular coordinates and data using the Jmol applet.

Initially (~2005), this project met with resistance from publishers, and the issue really amounted to what the definitive version of a scientific article should be. Should that definitive version be printable? That model, after all had served the community well for more than 300 years! And journals from the very beginning are still as readable now as when first published. In other words, print lasts! But print is pretty limiting after all. For a start, it is limited to 2D static representations. Molecules, by and large, do their magic in a dynamic three dimensions (4D in an Einsteinian sense). But print is also expensive; not merely to produce, but to transport paper around the world.

From the turn of the millennium, a number of publishers, amongst them the American Chemical Society, started to evolve the scientific article such that the pre-eminent version would now be considered to be the HTML form (perhaps as a prelude to phasing out print entirely? See an interesting commentary by a journal editor) and perhaps a digital Acrobat form which would be deemed to loose some of its functionality once printed (again see here for how Acrobat can be used to enhance things). Again however, a chicken-and-egg scenario resulted. To enhance the articles with extra functionality (such as data), they would need to find authors prepared to put the extra work into preparing the material. In fact, most authors already do that, but they call it supporting information. This is often highly data rich, covering materials such as spectra, coordinates and other information nowadays provided to researchers for analysis. Unfortunately, what has been missing is the education of authors to provide this information in a proper digital form which can be easily re-used by others, and on a Web page, converted automatically to nice interactive models. Most spectra which form part of the supporting information are in fact still scanned versions of printed spectra!

Enter computational chemists. Nowadays, they live in a world that truly does not need printing! Almost all of their data is already suitably digital. So perhaps it is no surprise to find that when enhanced journal articles started appearing around 2005, many were produced by this group of chemists. By now perhaps you are wondering what such an article might look like. Well, the remainder of this blog will be devoted to listing some examples. You will also notice that they come exclusively from our own publications. Perhaps someone will find the time to collect a far more representative set to better illustrate the diversity of this form, and how it is evolving. Meanwhile, you might wish to take a look at the following.

Part 1: The early days: 1994 onwards

These examples all relied on a browser plugin called Chime, which is no longer with us! Hence the pages designed to invoke it no longer display properly. But the data associated with the articles is still there!

  1. An early 1994 example of (hyper)activating a journal article can be seen here as the preliminary communication and
  2. in 1995 here as the final full article. I am told that this was the article that actually inspired the developers of Chime to enhance (Netscape) with a chemical plugin.
  3. This one from 1998 illustrates how articles can decay in functionality when Chime is no longer available.
  4. An ab initio and MNDO-d SCF-MO Computational Study of Stereoelectronic Control in Extrusion Reactions of R2I-F Iodine (III) Intermediates, M. A. Carroll, S. Martin-Santamaria, V. W. Pike, H. S. Rzepa and D. A. Widdowson, Perkin Trans. 2, 1999, 2707-2714 with the supporting information here.
  5. Huckel and Mobius Aromaticity and Trimerous transition state behaviour in the Pericyclic Reactions of [10], [14], [16] and [18] Annulenes. Sonsoles Martên-Santamarêa, Balasundaram Lavan and H. S. Rzepa, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2, 2000, 1415. with the supporting information here.
  6. Peter Murray-Rust, H. S. Rzepa and Michael Wright, “Development of Chemical Markup Language (CML) as a System for Handling Complex Chemical Content”, New J. Chem., 2001, 618-634. DOI: 10.1039/b008780g. This article broke new ground in that the supporting information was something of a misnomer. It was expressed entirely in XML, including all the chemistry data, and used XSLT transforms on the fly to regenerate the article. In that sense, it was actually a superset of the published article. It would be fair to say that this article was rather ahead of its time (although it does seem appropriate to publish it in a new journal!).
  7. M. Jakt, L. Johannissen, H. S. Rzepa, D. A. Widdowson and R. Wilhelm, “A Computational Study of the Mechanism of Palladium Insertion into Alkynyl and Aryl Carbon-Fluorine bonds”, Perkin Trans. 2, 2002, 576-581 and supporting information.
  8. P. Murray-Rust and H. S. Rzepa, chapter in “Handbook of Chemoinformatics. Part 2. Advanced Topics.”, ed. J. Gasteiger and T. Engel, 2003, Vol 1, was not enhanced per se, but did lay out the principles of how it might/should be done.
  9. K. P. Tellmann, M. J. Humphries, H. S. Rzepa and V. C. Gibson, “An experimental and computational study of β-H transfer between organocobalt complexes and 1-alkenes”, Organometallics, 2004, 23, 5503-5513. DOI: 10.1021/om049581h and supporting information.

Part 2: 2005.

These four examples all now invoke Jmol, which downloads upon request and hence does not rely on the presence of any browser plugin. The four articles were submited with supporting information in the form of HTML. These were associated with the main article, but were not formal part of that article. In that sense, they represent an incarnation of the traditional model, with all the data firmly resident in the supporting information.

  1. Gibson, Vernon C.; Marshall, Edward L.; Rzepa, H. S. ” A computational study on the ring-opening polymerization of lactide initiated by β-diketiminate metal alkoxides: The origin of heterotactic stereocontrol”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 6048-6051. DOI: 10.1021/ja043819b and supporting information.
  2. H. S. Rzepa, Mobius aromaticity and delocalization”, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 3697 – 3715. DOI: 10.1021/cr030092l and supporting information.
  3. H. S. Rzepa, “Double-twist Mšbius Aromaticity in a 4n+2 Electron Electrocyclic Reaction”, 2005, Chem Comm, 5220-5222. DOI: 10.1039/b510508k The supporting information is also available directly.
  4. H. S. Rzepa, “A Double-twist Mobius-aromatic conformation of [14]annulene”, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 637 – 4639. DOI: 10.1021/ol0518333 and supporting information.

Part 3: 2006 onwards

The supporting information has now been assimilated into the main body of the article proper, and within these confines contribute components such as enhanced figures or tables (i.e. enhanced with data)

  1. A. P. Dove, V. C. Gibson, E. L. Marshall, H. S. Rzepa, A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, “Synthetic, Structural, Mechanistic and Computational Studies on Single-Site β-Diketiminate Tin(II) Initiators for the Polymerization of rac-Lactide”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,128, 9834-9843. DOI: 10.1021/ja061400a The enhancement can be seen in Figure 11.
  2. O. Casher and H. S. Rzepa, “SemanticEye: A Semantic Web Application to Rationalise and Enhance Chemical Electronic Publishing”, J. Chem. Inf. Mod., 2006, 46, 2396-2411. DOI: 10.1021/ci060139e
  3. H S. Rzepa and M. E. Cass, “A Computational Study of the Nondissociative Mechanisms that Interchange Apical and Equatorial Atoms in Square Pyramidal Molecules”, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 3958–3963. DOI 10.1021/ic0519988. Interactive table at 10.1021/ic0519988/ic0519988.html
  4. M. E. Cass and H. S. Rzepa, “In Search of The Bailar Twist and Ray-Dutt mechanisms that racemize chiral tris-chelates: A computational study of Sc(III), V(III), Co(III), Zn(II) and Ga(III) complexes of a ligand analog of acetylacetonate”, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 49, 8024-8031. DOI: 10.1021/ic062473y The enhancement can be seen in Figure 2
  5. H. S. Rzepa, “Lemniscular Hexaphyrins as examples of aromatic and antiaromatic Double-Twist Möbius Molecules”, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 949-952.DOI:10.1021/ol703129z The enhancement can be seen in Web Table 1.
  6. D. C. Braddock and H. S. Rzepa, “Structural Reassignment of Obtusallenes V, VI and VII by GIAO-based Density functional prediction”, J. Nat. Prod., 2008, DOI: 10.1021/np0705918 and WEO1.
  7. S. M. Rappaport and H S. Rzepa, “Intrinsically Chiral Aromaticity. Rules Incorporating Linking Number, Twist, and Writhe for Higher-Twist Möbius Annulenes”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,, 7613-7619. DOI: 10.1021/ja710438j and WEO1 to 4
  8. C. S. M. Allan and H. S. Rzepa, “AIM and ELF Critical point and NICS Magnetic analyses of Möbius-type Aromaticity and Homoaromaticity in Lemniscular Annulenes and Hexaphyrins”, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 6615-6622. DOI: 10.1021/jo801022b and WEO1
  9. C. S. M. Allan and H. S. Rzepa, “Chiral aromaticities. Möbius Homoaromaticity”, J. Chem. Theory. Comp., 2008, 4, 1841-1848. DOI: 10.1021/ct8001915 and WEO1
  10. C. S. M Allan and H. S. Rzepa, “The structure of Polythiocyanogen: A Computational investigation”, Dalton Trans., 2008, 6925 – 6932. DOI: 10.1039/b810147g and enhanced Table
  11. H. S. Rzepa, “Wormholes in Chemical Space connecting Torus Knot and Torus Link π-electron density topologies”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 1340-1345. DOI: 10.1039/b810301a and enhanced Table.
  12. H. S. Rzepa, “The Chiro-optical properties of a Lemniscular Octaphyrin”, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 3088-3091. DOI: 10.1021/ol901172g
  13. C. S. Wannere, H. S. Rzepa, B. C. Rinderspacher, A. Paul, H. F. Schaefer III, P. v. R. Schleyer and C. S. M. Allan, “The geometry and electronic topology of higher-order Möbius charged Annulenes”, J. Phys. Chem., 2009, DOI: 10.1021/jp902176a and enhanced table
  14. H. S. Rzepa, “The distortivity of π-electrons in conjugated Boron rings.”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, DOI: 10.1039/B911817A and enhanced table.
  15. H. S. Rzepa, “The importance of being bonded”, Nature Chem., 2009, DOI: 10.1038/nchem.373 and the exploratorium.
  16. King Kuok Hii, J.L.Arbour, H.S.Rzepa, A.J.P.White, “Unusual Regiodivergence in Metal-Catalysed Intramolecular Cyclisation of γ-Allenols”, Chem. Commun, 2009, DOI: 10.1039/b913295c and enhanced table.
  17. L. F. V. Pinto, P. M. C. Glória, M. J. S. Gomes, H. S. Rzepa, S. Prabhakar, A. M. Lobo. “A Dramatic Effect of Double Bond Configuration in N-Oxy-3-aza Cope Rearrangements – A simple synthesis of functionalised allenes”, Tet. Lett., 2009, 50, 3446-3449. DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.02.228 and interactive table.
  18. H. S. Rzepa and C. S. M. Allan, “Racemization of isobornyl chloride via carbocations: a non-classical look at a classic mechanism”, J. Chem. Educ., 2010, DOI: 10.1021/ed800058c and interactive table.
  19. K. Abersfelder, A. J. P. White, H. S. Rzepa, and D. Scheschkewitz “A Tricyclic Aromatic Isomer of Hexasilabenzene”, Science, 2010, DOI: 10.1126/science.1181771 and interactive table.
  20. A. C. Spivey, L. Laraia, A. R. Bayly, H. S. Rzepa and A. J. P. White “Stereoselective Synthesis of cis- and trans-2,3-Disubstituted Tetrahydrofurans via Oxonium−Prins Cyclization: Access to the Cordigol Ring System”, Org. Lett., 2010, DOI 10.1021/ol9024259 and interactive table.
  21. J. Kong, P. v. R. Schleyer and H. S. Rzepa, “Successful Computational Modeling of Iso-bornyl Chloride Ion-Pair Mechanisms”, J. Org. Chem., 2010, DOI: 10.1021/jo100920e and interactive table.
  22. A. Smith, H. S. Rzepa, A. White, D. Billen, K. K. Hii, “Delineating Origins of Stereocontrol in Asymmetric Pd-Catalyzed α-Hydroxylation of 1,3-Ketoesters”, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 3085-3096. DOI: 10.1021/jo1002906 and interactive table.
  23. H. S. Rzepa “The rational design of helium bonds”, Nature Chem., 2010, 2, 390-393. DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.596 and web enhanced table.
  24. P. Rivera-Fuentes, J. Lorenzo Alonso-Gómez, A. G. Petrovic, P. Seiler, F. Santoro, N. Harada, N. Berova, H. S. Rzepa, and F. Diederich, “Enantiomerically Pure Alleno–Acetylenic Macrocycles: Synthesis, Solid-State Structures, Chiroptical Properties, and Electron Localization Function Analysis”, Chem. Eur. J., 2010, DOI: 10.1002/chem.201001087 and interactive figure
  25. H. S. Rzepa, “The Nature of the Carbon-Sulfur bond in the species H-CS-OH”, J. Chem. Theory. Comput., 2010, 49, DOI: 10.1021/ct100470g and interactive table.
  26. H. S. Rzepa, “Can 1,3-dimethylcyclobutadiene and carbon dioxide co-exist inside a supramolecular cavity?”, Chem. Commun., 2010, DOI: 10.1039/C0CC04023A and interactive table
  27. M. R. Crittall, H. S. Rzepa, and D. R. Carbery, “Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of a Helicenoidal DMAP Lewis Base Catalyst”, Org. Lett., 2011, DOI: 10.1021/ol2001705 and interactive table
  28. H. S. Rzepa, “The past, present and future of Scientific discourse”, J. Cheminformatics, 2011, 3, 46. DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-46 and interactive figure 3, figure 4 and figure 5.
  29. H. S. Rzepa, “A computational evaluation of the evidence for the synthesis of 1,3-dimethylcyclobutadiene in the solid state and aqueous solution”, Chem. Euro. J., 2012, in press.
  30. J. L. Arbour, H. S. Rzepa, L. A. Adrio, E. M. Barreiro, P. G. Pringle and K. K. (Mimi) Hii, “Silver-catalysed enantioselective additions of O-H and N-H to C=C bonds: Non-covalent interactions in stereoselective processes”, Chem. Euro. J., 2012, in press, Web table 1 and Web table 2.
  31. H. S. Rzepa, “Chemical datuments as scientific enablers”, J. Chemoinformatics, submitted.
  32. A. P. Buchard, F. Jutz, F. M. R. Kember, H. S. Rzepa, C. K. Williams, C.K., “Experimental and Computational Investigation of the Mechanism of Carbon Dioxide/Cyclohexene Oxide Copolymerization Using A Dizinc Catalyst”, in press. Interactivity box
  33. D. C. Braddock, D. Roy, D. Lenoir, E. Moore, H. S. Rzepa, J. I-Chia Wu and P. von R. Schleyer, “Verification of Stereospecific Dyotropic Racemisation of Enantiopure d and l-1,2-Dibromo-1,2-diphenylethane in Non-polar Media”, Chem. Comm., 2012, just published. DOI: 10.1039/C2CC33676F and interactivity box.
  34. K. Leszczyńska, K. Abersfelder, M. Majumdar, B. Neumann, H.-G. Stammler, H. S. Rzepa, P. Jutzi and D. Scheschkewitz, “The Cp*Si+ Cation as a Stoichiometric Source of Silicon, Chem. Comm., 2012, 48, 7820-7822. DOI: 10.1039/c2cc33911k. Cites links to 10042/to-13974, 10042/to-13982, 10042/to-13969, 10042/20028, 10042/to-13973, 10042/to-13985
  35. H. S. Rzepa, “A computational evaluation of the evidence for the synthesis of 1,3-dimethylcyclobutadiene in the solid state and aqueous solution”, Chem. Euro. J., 2013, 4932-4937. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201102942 and WebTable
  36. H. S. Rzepa, “Chemical datuments as scientific enablers”, J. Chemoinformatics, 2013, 4, DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-6. The interactivity box is integrated into the body of the article.
  37. M. J. Cowley, V. Huch, H. S. Rzepa, D. Scheschkewitz, “A Silicon Version of the Vinylcarbene – Cyclopropene Equilibrium: Isolation of a Base-Stabilized Disilenyl Silylene”, 2013, Nature Chem., in press and Webtable.
  38. M. J. S. Gomes, L. F. V. Pinto, H. S. Rzepa, S. Prabhakar, A. M. Lobo, “N-Heteroatom Substitution Effects in 3-Aza-Cope Rearrangements”, Chemistry Central, 2013, 7:94. doi:10.1186/1752-153X-7-94 and Table.
  39. H. S. Rzepa and C. Wentrup, “Mechanistic Diversity in Thermal Fragmentation Reactions: a Computational Exploration of CO and CO2 Extrusions from Five-Membered Rings”, J. Org. Chem., DOI: 10.1021/jo401146k and Table.
  40. D. C. Braddock, J. Clarke and H. S. Rzepa “Epoxidation of Bromoallenes Connects Red Algae Metabolites by an Intersecting Bromoallene Oxide – Favorskii Manifold”, Chem. Comm., 2013, DOI: 10.1039/C3CC46720A and Table.
  41. M. J. Fuchter, Ya-Pei Lo and H. S. Rzepa, “Mechanistic and chiroptical studies on the desulfurization of epidithiodioxopiperazines reveal universal retention of configuration at the bridgehead carbon atoms”, J. Org. Chem., 2013, in press. doi: 10.1021/jo401316a and table.

References

  1. H.S. Rzepa, B.J. Whitaker, and M.J. Winter, "Chemical applications of the World-Wide-Web system", Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, pp. 1907, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1039/c39940001907

Tags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Chemical IT, Interesting chemistry | 6 Comments »