Posts Tagged ‘Physical organic chemistry’
Friday, March 10th, 2017
George Olah passed away on March 8th. He was part of the generation of scientists in the post-war 1950s who had access to chemical instrumentation that truly revolutionised chemistry. In particular he showed how the then newly available NMR spectroscopy illuminated structures of cations in solvents such “Magic acid“. The obituaries will probably mention his famous “feud” with H. C. Brown over the structure of the norbornyl cation (X=CH2+), implicated in the mechanism of many a solvolysis reaction that characterised the golden period of physical organic chemistry just before and after WWII.
The dispute between Olah and Brown was not played on a pitch using quite the same goal posts. Olah did much of his work in magic acid and Brown did his in aqueous solutions. I was involved in a tiny way when the discussion about the precise character of the norbornyl cation was reaching its peak in the mid 1970s. At the time, I was working with Michael Dewar, who was himself not shy in joining in the fun and sometimes very acrimonious disputes at conferences. We contributed by calculating the so-called core-electron carbon ESCA spectrum.[1] History records that we came down on the wrong side,‡ by suggesting that this form of spectroscopy supported Brown rather than Winstein/Olah on the basis of a 6:1 spectral deconvolution (classical) rather than 5:2 (non-classical). More recently of course the crystal structure of the parent cation itself has been shown to be non-classical[2] (there are other crystal structures which differ in respect to having one or more additional methyl groups[3]). For a 3D model of norbornyl cation, see DOI: 10.5517/CCZ21LN. This still leaves the issue (very slightly) open for the structure of the solvated cation when formed in water!
When I started to teach a course in molecular modelling, I touched briefly on how modelling could contribute and whilst updating the notes in the 1990s, wondered why the boron analogue had never been so studied (X=BH2). Unlike the crystallographically difficult norbornyl ion-pair, the iso-electronic boron species would be neutral and not need a counter-ion. Perhaps it might be a more manageable molecule? Checking the Cambridge structural database, such a species has never been reported!† So here as my homage to Olah, I report its calculated structure (b2plypd3/Def2-TZVPP, DOI: 10.14469/hpc/2236).
The norbornyl cation has symmetrical C-C bridging distances of ~1.80±0.02Å and a basal C-C distance of ~1.39±0.02Å. The calculated values for the boron equivalent are 2.16Å and 1.36Å respectively, with all positive force constants. B-C bonds are normally 1.66-1.72Å, significantly longer than C-C bonds, which makes the longer B-C lengths in this example unsurprising. More interestingly, the species has one vibrational normal mode (ν 203 cm-1) which corresponds to the [1,2] shift of the BH2 group across the basal C-C. For a classical species, this vibrational motion would correspond to a transition state (an imaginary vibration) but for a non-classical species it is of course real. In this sense it is analogous to the so-called real Kekulé mode in non-classical benzene, which “equilibrates” the two classical Kekulé structures. The corresponding calculated vibration for the norbornyl cation itself is ν 194 cm-1 (DOI: 10.14469/hpc/2238).
Of course, the entire controversy over the structure of this species is littered with comparisons between not quite similar systems, differing in a methyl group more or less. So morphing a C+ to a B might be seen as quite a large change. But perhaps if it had been crystallised in say the 1960s, would the subsequent debates have taken a different turn?
‡ We were also wrong about the symmetry of the Diels-Alder cyclisation, which is nowadays accepted to be synchronous rather than asynchronous for simple Diels-Alder reactions. But that is another story.
†GAXLIA is perhaps the closest analogue.[4],
References
- M.J.S. Dewar, R.C. Haddon, A. Komornicki, and H. Rzepa, "Ground states of molecules. 34. MINDO/3 calculations for nonclassical ions", Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 99, pp. 377-385, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00444a012
- F. Scholz, D. Himmel, F.W. Heinemann, P.V.R. Schleyer, K. Meyer, and I. Krossing, "Crystal Structure Determination of the Nonclassical 2-Norbornyl Cation", Science, vol. 341, pp. 62-64, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1238849
- T. Laube, "Redetermination of the Crystal Structure of the 1,2,4,7‐<i>anti</i>‐tetramethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan‐2‐yl cation at 110 K", Helvetica Chimica Acta, vol. 77, pp. 943-956, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19940770407
- P.J. Fagan, E.G. Burns, and J.C. Calabrese, "Synthesis of boroles and their use in low-temperature Diels-Alder reactions with unactivated alkenes", Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 110, pp. 2979-2981, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00217a053
Tags:2-Norbornyl cation, aqueous solutions, Chemical bond, chemical instrumentation, Chemistry, George Andrew Olah, George Olah, Ion association, Magic acid, Michael Dewar, Molecule, Nature, Physical organic chemistry, Reactive intermediates, spectroscopy
Posted in Interesting chemistry | 18 Comments »
Sunday, March 5th, 2017
Cyclobutadiene is one of those small iconic molecules, the transience and instability of which was explained theoretically long before it was actually detected in 1965.[1] Given that instability, I was intrigued as to how many crystal structures might have been reported for this ring system, along with the rather more stable congener cyclo-octatetraene. Here is what I found.
The Conquest search query shown (with no disorder, no errors and R < 0.1 also specified). 
There are 23 instances (February 2017 database; see DOI: 10.14469/hpc/2231 for search query) of the supposedly unstable cyclobutadiene motif!
The three clusters deserve explanations. The orange cluster reveals a long C-C bond (rather longer than normal C-C bonds), accompanied by short C=C bonds, as indicated by the valence bond form shown below. Take particular note that the arrow connecting the two forms is NOT a resonance arrow but an equilibrium arrow. The “bond shifting” is not fast but slow, allowing long and short bonds to be measured in a crystal structure.
The rather larger blue cluster exhibits much more equal bonds. These arise from the presence of “push-pull” substituents on the ring which serve to delocalise the unfavourable cyclobutadiene ring and hence decrease the unfavourable anti-aromaticity. A typical example is shown below (EACBUT):
The small red cluster shows a long C=C bond and a short C-C bond! I have commented previously on apparently abnormally long C=C bonds, which in fact all turned out to be errors, and I suspect the same is true here. The bond orders in the indexing in the CSD data base have probably been mis-assigned, as per below for GANBII;
The Conquest search query is shown (with no disorder, no errors and R < 0.1 specified) for the 8-ring, which further specifies a torsion angle about a C-C bond to determine how planar the ring might be.
The “normal” cluster in the top left exhibits long C-C bonds and short C=C bonds. The colour code indicates how planar the ring is (red-blue spectrum = twisted ⇒ planar). The majority of examples are twisted about the C-C bond(s), but there are a few interesting examples that are not, as shown by the blue dots. There are only a few “bond-equalised” examples in the centre; perhaps “push-pull” induced equalisation is more difficult or perhaps few examples have been made?
The members of the red cluster in the bottom right all reveal short “C-C” bonds and long “C=C” bonds. Intriguingly they all also have low values of the torsion about one C-C bond (although not always about all four C-C bonds). A typical example (BAQVUK, DOI: 10.5517/CC4GWWB ) is shown below. These all need careful inspection and possibly reversal of the C-C and C=C indexing.
It was interesting to discover how many crystalline examples of this archetypal “unstable” cyclobutadiene motif have been made, and the means by which some of them at least have been stabilized. In the more abundant cyclo-octatetraene system, I learnt that one has to be cautious about blindly accepting the bond order designations in the database. Perhaps we might learn here that some of these have indeed been re-assigned in the next release of the database.
References
- L. Watts, J.D. Fitzpatrick, and R. Pettit, "Cyclobutadiene", Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 87, pp. 3253-3254, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01092a049
Tags:antiaromaticity, Chemistry, cyclobutadiene, Instability, Nature, Physical organic chemistry, Physics, search query
Posted in crystal_structure_mining | 4 Comments »
Sunday, March 5th, 2017
Cyclobutadiene is one of those small iconic molecules, the transience and instability of which was explained theoretically long before it was actually detected in 1965.[1] Given that instability, I was intrigued as to how many crystal structures might have been reported for this ring system, along with the rather more stable congener cyclo-octatetraene. Here is what I found.
The Conquest search query shown (with no disorder, no errors and R < 0.1 also specified). 
There are 23 instances (February 2017 database; see DOI: 10.14469/hpc/2231 for search query) of the supposedly unstable cyclobutadiene motif!
The three clusters deserve explanations. The orange cluster reveals a long C-C bond (rather longer than normal C-C bonds), accompanied by short C=C bonds, as indicated by the valence bond form shown below. Take particular note that the arrow connecting the two forms is NOT a resonance arrow but an equilibrium arrow. The “bond shifting” is not fast but slow, allowing long and short bonds to be measured in a crystal structure.
The rather larger blue cluster exhibits much more equal bonds. These arise from the presence of “push-pull” substituents on the ring which serve to delocalise the unfavourable cyclobutadiene ring and hence decrease the unfavourable anti-aromaticity. A typical example is shown below (EACBUT):
The small red cluster shows a long C=C bond and a short C-C bond! I have commented previously on apparently abnormally long C=C bonds, which in fact all turned out to be errors, and I suspect the same is true here. The bond orders in the indexing in the CSD data base have probably been mis-assigned, as per below for GANBII;
The Conquest search query is shown (with no disorder, no errors and R < 0.1 specified) for the 8-ring, which further specifies a torsion angle about a C-C bond to determine how planar the ring might be.
The “normal” cluster in the top left exhibits long C-C bonds and short C=C bonds. The colour code indicates how planar the ring is (red-blue spectrum = twisted ⇒ planar). The majority of examples are twisted about the C-C bond(s), but there are a few interesting examples that are not, as shown by the blue dots. There are only a few “bond-equalised” examples in the centre; perhaps “push-pull” induced equalisation is more difficult or perhaps few examples have been made?
The members of the red cluster in the bottom right all reveal short “C-C” bonds and long “C=C” bonds. Intriguingly they all also have low values of the torsion about one C-C bond (although not always about all four C-C bonds). A typical example (BAQVUK, DOI: 10.5517/CC4GWWB ) is shown below. These all need careful inspection and possibly reversal of the C-C and C=C indexing.
It was interesting to discover how many crystalline examples of this archetypal “unstable” cyclobutadiene motif have been made, and the means by which some of them at least have been stabilized. In the more abundant cyclo-octatetraene system, I learnt that one has to be cautious about blindly accepting the bond order designations in the database. Perhaps we might learn here that some of these have indeed been re-assigned in the next release of the database.
References
- L. Watts, J.D. Fitzpatrick, and R. Pettit, "Cyclobutadiene", Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 87, pp. 3253-3254, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01092a049
Tags:antiaromaticity, Chemistry, cyclobutadiene, Instability, Nature, Physical organic chemistry, Physics, search query
Posted in crystal_structure_mining | 4 Comments »
Thursday, December 1st, 2016
Following on from a search for long C-C bonds, here is the same repeated for C=C double bonds.
The query restricts the search to each carbon having just two non-metallic substituents. To avoid conjugation with these, they each are 4-coordinated; the carbons themselves are three-coordinated. Further constraints are the usual no disorder, no errors and R < 0.1 and the C=C distance > 1.4Å (the standard value is ~1.32-1.34Å). The search query is deposited as DOI: 10.14469/hpc/1959[1]
The apparent longest example is LIRVEN, DOI: 10.5517/CC4R2MK[2] with a value of 1.589Å, longer than most C-C single bonds! Closer inspection reveals the presence of lithium cations, and so the molecule bearing the C=C bond must sustain two negative charges. So this apparent C=C bond is in fact anionic, with one electron going into each of the π* orbitals, thus lengthening the CC bond.‡ Not a true example of a neutral C=C bond[3] but it now becomes interesting for what its spin state might be. Is it a biradical or a triplet for example? One to be investigated further I fancy! Another example of this type is QUKCEE[4]
This next FAZWIM has a C=C length of 1.546Å. It is an old structure (1986), and comes without attached hydrogen atoms. Although drawn with no hydrogens on the central C=C bond, the length suggests this molecule is simply mis-assigned.†
The final example I will highlight is pretty ordinary looking and published in 2016 as a private communication; ALOVOO, DOI: 10.5517/CCDC.CSD.CC1LJSWS[5] with a C=C length of 1.443Å. Again no obvious reason for the bond to be longer than normal.‡†
In hunting for such unusual deviations from the norm, the most obvious explanation is normally some anomaly in the crystallographic analysis. Although the CSD (crystal structure database) is a very heavily curated resource, it seems unlikely that each deposition would be carefully inspected for its chemistry, and this must be our task here. But such anomalies can themselves point to interesting or unusual chemistry, which in turn can be subjected to quantum computation to see if either the unusual value can be replicated or other reasons identified. In this case, this exercise can been conducted by a human, but one can easily envisage the entire process being automated on a far larger scale. The future?
‡ In fact the stoichiometry shows each “double bond” is actually a di-anion, with two electrons entering each of the the π* orbitals.
†A calculation on the singlet state for the structure as drawn (ωB97XD/Def2-TZVPP, DOI: 10.14469/hpc/1960) gives a bond length of 1.342Å, i.e. that expected for a double bond. The triplet state is similar in energy, but with a much longer central bond length of 1.476Å, DOI: 10.14469/hpc/1962 but the geometry at the carbons is planar and not bent as shown above. The quintet state is 1.45Å and is again planar, doi 10.14469/hpc/1963. So calculations on FAZWIM strongly suggest the structure as shown is an error.
‡†The computed value is 1.324Å, perfectly normal. DOI: 10.14469/hpc/1966[6]
References
- H. Rzepa, "Long C=C bonds", 2016. https://doi.org/10.14469/hpc/1959
- Matsuo, T.., Watanabe, H.., Ichinohe, M.., and Sekiguchi, A.., "CCDC 141348: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination", 2000. https://doi.org/10.5517/cc4r2mk
- T. Matsuo, H. Watanabe, M. Ichinohe, and A. Sekiguchi, "Reduction of the 1,4,5,8-tetrasila-1,4,5,8-tetrahydroanthracene derivative with lithium metal. Isolation and characterization of the tetralithium salt of a tetraanion, and observation of an Si–H⋯Li+ interaction", Inorganic Chemistry Communications, vol. 2, pp. 510-512, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1387-7003(99)00136-7
- T. Matsuo, H. Watanabe, and A. Sekiguchi, "A Novel Tetralithium Salt of a Tetraanion and a Dilithium Salt of a Dianion, Formed by the Reduction of the Tetrasilylethylene Moiety. Synthesis, Characterization, and Observation of an Si-H···Li+ Interaction", Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, vol. 73, pp. 1461-1467, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.73.1461
- M.E. Light, S. Bain, and J. Kilburn, "CCDC 1475906: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination", 2016. https://doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc1ljsws
- H. Rzepa, "ALOVOO", 2016. https://doi.org/10.14469/hpc/1966
Tags:Chemical bond, chemical bonding, Chemical nomenclature, Chemistry, Conjugated system, double bond, energy, Nature, Nonmetal, Organic chemistry, Physical organic chemistry, search query, Substituent
Posted in crystal_structure_mining, Interesting chemistry | 2 Comments »
Monday, August 8th, 2016
The previous post contained an exploration of the anomeric effect as it occurs at an atom centre X for which the effect is manifest in crystal structures. Here I quantify the effect, by selecting the test molecule MeO-X-OMe, where X is of two types:
- A two-coordinate atom across the series B-O and Al-S, and carrying the appropriate molecular charge such that X carries two lone pairs of electrons (thus the charge is 0 for O, but -3 for B).
- A four-coordinate atom across the series B-O and Al-S, with X-H bonds replacing the lone pairs on this centre in the previous example, and again with appropriate molecule charges (e.g. +2 for SH2).
The donor in the anomeric interaction always originates on the oxygen of the MeO group attached to X. The acceptor is always the X-O σ* empty orbital. The results (table below, ωB97XD/Def2-TZVPP calculation, NBO E(2) in kcal/mol) confirm that as X gets more electronegative, the X-O σ* empty orbital becomes a better acceptor, and so the NBO E(2) interaction energy which quantifies the anomeric interaction gets larger. Eventually (with X=OH2) the donation of electrons into the X-O σ* empty orbital becomes so effective that the X-O bond (in this case O-O) dissociates fully and the NBO perturbation cannot be computed. Also for reference, a “normal” anomeric interaction (such as is found in e.g. sugars) is around 18 kcal/mol. Anything larger than this could be considered especially strong, and anything less than ~10 kcal/mol would be regarded as weak.
| X[1]* |
| BH2 |
CH2 |
NH2 |
OH2 |
| 12.5 |
17.7 |
18.5 |
dissociates |
| AlH2 |
SiH2 |
PH2 |
SH2 |
| 6.9 |
12.9 |
21.9 |
31.3 |
| B |
C |
N |
O |
| 8.3 |
11.7 |
12.9 |
14.2 |
| Al |
Si |
P |
S |
| 4.8 |
6.6 |
11.2 |
18.2 |
For the entry X=S, the E(2) term is actually larger than for the oxygen. I should note that the Me group itself is not passive in this process. The C-H bonds can also act as significant electron donors, but here I am not going to analyse this additional complexity.
This table reveals that there is nothing special about carbon as an anomeric centre, and here also the normal intimate association with the term anomeric and heterocyclohexanes such as found in sugars.
* Here I introduce a refinement to my normal process of citing the data produced for any specific calculation. Rather than including 16 individual citations for each cell in the table, I have gathered all these calculations into a collection and cite here only the DOI of that collection. When resolved, the individual members of that collection can then be inspected for the actual data.
References
- H. Rzepa, "Anomeric interactions at atom centres", 2016. https://doi.org/10.14469/hpc/1221
Tags:Anomer, Anomeric effect, Atomic orbital, Carbohydrate chemistry, Carbohydrates, Chemical bond, chemical bonding, Chemistry, Hydrogen bond, interaction energy, Lone pair, Physical organic chemistry, Quantum chemistry
Posted in Interesting chemistry | No Comments »
Saturday, August 6th, 2016
In the last few posts, I have explored the anomeric effect as it occurs at an atom centre X. Here I try to summarise the atoms for which the effect is manifest in crystal structures.
The effect is defined by X bearing two substituents, one of which Z is a centre bearing a “lone pair” of electrons (or two electrons in a π-bond), and another Y in which the X-Y bond has a low-lying acceptor or σ* empty orbital into which the lone pair can be donated. This donation will only occur if the Z-lone pair and the X-Y bond vectors align antiperiplanar. Here is the summary so far.
As required of a good periodic table, it has gaps that need completing, in this case X=N and X=S. Firstly N, for which the small molecule below is known (FUHFAP).
A ωB97XD/Def2-TZVPP calculation[1] yields an electron density distribution, which can be collected into monosynaptic basins using the ELF technique. There are two oxygen lone pairs (17 and 20) that are close to antiperiplanar to the adjacent N-O bond, having E(2) interaction energies obtained using the NBO method of 15.1 and 15.8 kcal/mol, typical of the anomeric range. The basin labelled 13 on X=N1 below is also perfectly aligned antiperiplanar with the adjacent O3-C2 bond, but its E(2) interaction energy is only 7.3 kcal/mol. Thus a strong anomeric interaction on the anomeric atom itself does not seem to occur. The same effect was noted for X=O in the previous post; the explanation remains unidentified.
With the X=S gap, we have lots of opportunity with polysulfide compounds, a good example of which is the C2-symmetric and helical S8 dianion TEGWAF[2]
Each of the 8 sulfur atoms exhibits antiperiplanar orientation of an S lone pair with an adjacent S-S acceptor σ* orbital;
1:2-3=23.7 kcal/mol;
2:3-4=18.5;
3:4-8=11.7, 3:2-1=7.4;
4:8-7=11.4, 4:3-2=9.2.
This just surveys the central main group elements, and it is possible that this little mini-periodic table may yet grow.
References
- H.S. Rzepa, "C 2 H 7 N 1 O 2", 2016. https://doi.org/10.14469/ch/195294
- Rybak, W.K.., Cymbaluk, A.., Skonieczny, J.., and Siczek, M.., "CCDC 880780: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination", 2012. https://doi.org/10.5517/ccykj88
Tags:Acetals, Alkane stereochemistry, Anomer, Anomeric effect, Atomic orbital, Carbohydrate chemistry, Carbohydrates, Chemical bond, Chemistry, interaction energy, Lone pair, Physical organic chemistry, Stereochemistry
Posted in crystal_structure_mining, Interesting chemistry | No Comments »
Friday, July 1st, 2016
The anomeric effect occurs at 4-coordinate (sp3) carbon centres carrying two oxygen substituents and involves an alignment of a lone electron pair on one oxygen with the adjacent C-O σ*-bond of the other oxygen. Here I explore whether other centres can exhibit the phenomenon. I start with 4-coordinate boron, using the crystal structure search definition below (along with R < 0.1, no disorder, no errors).[1]
The result shows two prominent clusters, one with both torsion angles being 180°, and another with both being ~60°. This latter is the one that implies that there must be two lone pairs, one on each oxygen, that are anti-periplanar to the adjacent B-O bond. There are two more diffuse clusters where only one antiperiplanar alignment is seen. So yes, 4-coordinate boron can exhibit an anomeric effect!
This compares to the carbon-anomeric plot which is shown here for comparison, where the top right cluster of 180° torsions contains proportionately few hits than with boron.
The next centre is at 4-coordinate silicon. Again three significant clusters are seen; one with two antiperiplanar lone pair alignments with Si-O bonds, and two more with just one such alignment. The previous hotspot for which both measured torsions were 180° is largely absent. So here, the anomeric effect is much stronger. Notice also that whereas the torsions in the region of 60° for the carbon centre lie along a ridge coincident with the diagonal (bottom left to top right), that for the silicon centre show a ridge running orthogonal to the diagonal. An interesting point to follow up perhaps?
Since the off-diagonal clusters are relatively prominent, implying just one anomeric interaction, it is of interest to see if this results in any asymmetry in the two Si-O bond lengths. If its present, the effect is small.
Finally 4-coordinate group 15 elements. Most of the hits are in fact for P; there are none for N. This shows four clusters; the two on the diagonal show respectively two and no antiperiplanar interactions. The two off-diagonal clusters show just one such orientation. As with Si, the ridge in the 60° region run orthogonal to the diagonal.
So this little exploration shows that the anomeric effect, best known for sugars and at a carbon centre, is in fact more general to the adjacent elements.
References
- H. Rzepa, "Anomeric effects at boron, silicon and phosphorus.", 2016. https://doi.org/10.14469/hpc/696
Tags:Acetals, Alkane stereochemistry, Anomer, Anomeric effect, Bond length, Boron, Carbohydrate, Carbohydrate chemistry, Carbohydrates, crystal structure search definition, Ester, Physical organic chemistry, Stereochemistry
Posted in crystal_structure_mining | No Comments »
Wednesday, June 22nd, 2016
I previously used data mining of crystal structures to explore the directing influence of substituents on aromatic and heteroatomatic rings. Here I explore, quite literally, a different angle to the hydrogen bonding interactions between a benzene ring and OH or NH groups.
I start by defining a benzene ring with a centroid. The distance is from that centroid to the H atom of an OH or NH group and the angle is C-centroid-H. To limit the search to approach of the OH or NH group more or less orthogonal to the ring, the absolute value of the torsion between the centroid-H vector and the ring C-C vector is constrained to lie between 70-100° (the other constraints being no disorder, no errors, T < 140K and R < 0.05).[1]
The above shows the results for NH groups interacting with the aromatic ring. The maximum distance 2.8Å is more or less the van der Waals contact distance between a hydrogen and a carbon and as you can see the contacts "funnel down" to the centroid at < 2.1Å. The shortest distance[2] is for ammonium tetraphenylborate, which you can view in e.g. spacefill mode here[3]
The other interesting close contact derives from a protonated pyridine[4], which can in turn be viewed here.[5] The main message from the distribution shown above is that as the distances between the HN and the centroid get shorter, the "trajectory" of approach remains orthogonal to the ring (the angle defined above remains ~90°) and heads towards the centroid of the π-cloud. The hotspot itself (red, ~2.6Å) also lies along this trajectory.
Recollect that when I used such hydrogen bonding to see if crystal structures discriminate between the ortho or meta positions of a ring carrying an electron donating substituent, it was the distance from a HO to the carbon that was measured as the discriminator. So it's a faint surprise to find that with HN, and without the necessary perturbation of an electron donating substituent, the intrinsic preference seems to be for the ring centroid and not any specific carbon atom of the ring.
So how about the OH group? There are in fact rather fewer examples, and so the statistics are a bit less clear-cut. But there is a tantalising suggestion that this time, the trajectory is not ~90° but rather less, implying that the destination is no longer the centroid of the π-cloud but one of the carbon atoms of the ring itself. For those who like to "read between the lines" and spot things that are absent rather than present, you may have asked yourself why I did not use NH probes in my earlier post. Well, it appears that the NH group is less effective at e.g. o/p discrimination than is an OH group.
I can only speculate as to the origins (real or not) of the difference in behaviour between OH and NH groups towards a phenyl π-face. Perhaps it is simply bias in the CSD database? Or might there be electronic origins? Time to end with that phrase "watch this space".
References
- H. Rzepa, "How does an OH or NH group approach an aromatic ring to hydrogen bond with its Ï-face?", 2016. https://doi.org/10.14469/hpc/673
- T. Steiner, and S.A. Mason, "Short N<sup>+</sup>—H...Ph hydrogen bonds in ammonium tetraphenylborate characterized by neutron diffraction", Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, vol. 56, pp. 254-260, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108768199012318
- Steiner, T.., and Mason, S.A.., "CCDC 144361: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination", 2000. https://doi.org/10.5517/cc4v6tz
- O. Danylyuk, B. Leśniewska, K. Suwinska, N. Matoussi, and A.W. Coleman, "Structural Diversity in the Crystalline Complexes of <i>para</i>-Sulfonato-calix[4]arene with Bipyridinium Derivatives", Crystal Growth & Design, vol. 10, pp. 4542-4549, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg100831c
- Danylyuk, O.., Lesniewska, B.., Suwinska, K.., Matoussi, N.., and Coleman, A.W.., "CCDC 819118: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination", 2011. https://doi.org/10.5517/ccwhc5w
Tags:10.1021, 10.1107, 10.5517, aromaticity, benzene, Centroid, chemical bonding, data mining, Functional groups, Hydrogen bond, Physical organic chemistry, Pyridine, Simple aromatic rings, Supramolecular chemistry
Posted in Chemical IT, crystal_structure_mining | 3 Comments »
Monday, May 30th, 2016
This is a follow-up to one aspect of the previous two posts dealing with nucleophilic substitution reactions at silicon. Here I look at the geometries of 5-coordinate compounds containing as a central atom 4A = Si, Ge, Sn, Pb and of the specific formula C34AO2 with a trigonal bipyramidal geometry. This search arose because of a casual comment I made in the earlier post regarding possible cooperative effects between the two axial ligands (the ones with an angle of ~180 degrees subtended at silicon). Perhaps the geometries might expand upon this comment?
The search query is shown above results in 394 hits (May 2016) and is presented with the three variables in the query plotted as below, with the O-4A-O angle indicated by colour (red ~ 180°; blue ~90° and green ~120°).
- The cluster at distances of 4A-O of ~1.9Å represents silicon compounds, and tends to suggest that the pair of distances 4A-O are quite similar in value. The angles correspond to a di-axial arrangement around the silicon. In this scenario, one might imagine a stereoelectronic effect similar to the anomeric effect when 4A = C operates and which has the potential to strengthen both di-axial oxygens.
- The bulk of the points come at higher 4A-O distances of > 2.1Å and consist mostly of 4A = Sn. There are two a clear-cut distributions, one for angles of ~180° and a separate one for angles of ~90° and both are qualitatively different from the Si distribution. The 180° set corresponds to a di-axial arrangement for the oxygens, whereas the 90° set suggests an axial-equatorial geometry. Both distributions have prominent tails which reveal that as one 4A-O distance shortens, the other lengthens, equivalent to asymmetric anomeric effects at O-C-O.
- Noticeably absent are any green points; these would correspond to bond angles of ~120° and hence would correspond to di-equatorial ligands.
This quick exploration (with potential variations that I have not explored above) can be added to the collection of “ten minute explorations” I have described elsewhere.[1]
References
- H.S. Rzepa, "Discovering More Chemical Concepts from 3D Chemical Information Searches of Crystal Structure Databases", Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 93, pp. 550-554, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00346
Tags:Anomer, Anomeric effect, Carbohydrate chemistry, Carbohydrates, Ligand, Molecular geometry, Physical organic chemistry, Stereochemistry, Stereoelectronic effect, Trigonal bipyramidal molecular geometry
Posted in Chemical IT, crystal_structure_mining | 3 Comments »
Wednesday, May 11th, 2016
I have previously commented on the Bürgi–Dunitz angle, this being the preferred approach trajectory of a nucleophile towards the electrophilic carbon of a carbonyl group. Some special types of nucleophile such as hydrazines (R2N-NR2) are supposed to have enhanced reactivity[1] due to what might be described as buttressing of adjacent lone pairs. Here I focus in on how this might manifest by performing searches of the Cambridge structural database for intermolecular (non-bonded) interactions between X-Y nucleophiles (X,Y= N,O,S) and carbonyl compounds OC(NM)2.
The search query[2] is shown above and involves plotting the distance from the nucleophilic atom (N above) to the carbon of the carbonyl group. The carbon is defined as having 3-coordination, one of which is O=C and two non-metal attachments. The torsion is constrained to values of |70-110|° to ensure that the approach of the nucleophile is approximately perpendicular to the plane of the carbonyl in order to overlap with the π*-orbital as electrophile. The pairwise sums of van der Waals radii are NC, 3.25; OC, 3.22 and SC, 3.5Å and the plots show all contacts shorter than these. The results of the searches are shown below.
The general observation is that the red hotspots do tend to come at trajectory angles of <100° and many are <90° such as the X=Y=N or X=Y=S examples. Given that the original Bürgi–Dunitz hypothesis (actually based on a small number of molecules synthesized for the purpose) proposed rather larger angles (105±5°) corresponding to optimum alignment of the nucleophile with the carbonyl π*-orbital, we might speculate whether the use of enhanced nucleophiles is the reason for the apparent decrease in the angle. And if so, what the underlying reasons would be.
I also cannot help but observe that the term supernucleophile is quite rare in the literature; SciFinder gives only 45 hits, but most are about neither hydrazines nor peroxides. There are also some unusual nucleophile varieties such as Cob(I)alamin[3], of which there are probably insufficient examples to reflect in the crystal structure statistics shown above. Given the interest in superbases, the relative lack of examples of unusual supernucleophiles seems surprising.
References
- G. Klopman, K. Tsuda, J. Louis, and R. Davis, "Supernucleophiles—I", Tetrahedron, vol. 26, pp. 4549-4554, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-4020(01)93101-1
- H. Rzepa, "Crystal structure search using enhanced nucleophiles", 2016. https://doi.org/10.14469/hpc/487
- K.P. Jensen, "Electronic Structure of Cob(I)alamin: The Story of an Unusual Nucleophile", The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, pp. 10505-10512, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp050802m
Tags:Bases, Bürgi–Dunitz angle, Carbonyl, Electrophile, Ester, Flippin–Lodge angle, Functional groups, hydrazine, non-metal attachments, Nucleophile, Physical organic chemistry, search query, Superbase
Posted in Chemical IT, crystal_structure_mining | 1 Comment »