Nitrogen tri-iodide, or more accurately the complex between it and ammonia ranks amongst the oldest known molecules (1812). I became familiar with it around the age of 12-13, in an era long gone when boys (and very possibly girls too) were allowed to make such substances in their parent’s back gardens‡ and in fact in the school science laboratory,† an experiment which earned me a personal request to visit the head teacher.
With pyridine replacing the ammonia (I presume crystallographers are often reluctant to put sensitive crystals into their instruments), the polymeric structure PYDTIN is shown below[1] (see also IODMAM[2]. Each nitrogen is approximately tetrahedral. As with the DABCO/I2 complex discussed in the preceding post, it consists of chains of …N-I-N-I… units, with weak crosslinks (4.31Å) to adjacent chains. Six units of NI3 are shown below, although it is clear that the term nitrogen tri-iodide does not really begin to describe what is happening.

Click for 3D
In terms of the D….X-A formalism outlined in the first post about halogen bonds, D = N, X = I and A = N. This system is in fact palindromic, since either of the N…I interactions could be described as the halogen bond. Which brings me to hydrogen bonds., D…H-A. They two adopt two forms, the first in which the proton is asymmetrically disposed to either D or A and the second where the proton exists exactly half way between. It is rather nice that this analogy also pertains for halogen bonds.
More interesting however is why? So a ωB97XD/Def2-TZVPP-PP calculation on the above unit. Recollect that for DABCO-I2, the short N…I distance was in part probably due to compression resulting from attractive dispersion interchain forces. Again deprived of a full periodic boundary model, the unit above changes shape upon such calculation, and in particular the N…I…N interaction desymmetrises. Is this because of the lack of a full crystal lattice, or because e.g. a functional such as ωB97XD favours asymmetric halogen bonds? It is certainly true that for the simpler hydrogen bond, the asymmetric double-well potential and the symmetric single-well potentials often only differ by a few kcal/mol, and hence that some methods predict the same system asymmetric and others symmetric. Since we already suspect that this N…I distance is sufficiently soft that it can be perturbed by dispersion attractions elsewhere in the molecule, perhaps this is also true here?

Click for 3D
I cannot here solve the issue of whether some halogen bonds exist in symmetric potentials because they intrinsically disposed to do so, or whether this is induced by the larger environment of the crystal. But it is certainly apparent that this molecule, known for 202 years now, is still of modern interest and relevance.
‡My grasp of quantities was rather vague, and I set out 2-3 mounds of the stuff on the garden path, possibly as much as 1g each. One needs to wait an hour or so to allow the mound to dry out. The first visitor to the garden following this drying out period was my mother, who had come to put the washing on the line, a line that followed exactly that of the path itself. She did not quite know what to make of the loud crack originating from her shoes, but was much more alarmed by the substantial cloud of purple vapours that enveloped her feet and slowly rose upwards. Well, if you have not read any chemistry books, what would you make of such an experience? I will also record here my other experiment in the garden. My father had put a very old fridge there, prior to arranging its permanent removal. I pondered what the refrigerant might be, and so rather optimistically sawed through the pipe with a test tube ready to collect any liquid that might flow out. It was SO2, and not un-naturally I fled the scene. This must have been at dusk, since I only returned the following morning. My parents proud and joy was a tenderly cared for lawn. That morning, it was pure white. It was bordered by campanula, which were still resolutely blue, making for a rather nice contrasting colour scheme. But with no explanation to hand to give my parents for my inadvertent garden redesign, I instead went to school. The odd thing was that when I returned that afternoon, absolutely no mention was made by either parent of the strange change in colour of the lawn (it was back to normal about two weeks later, with no permanent harm done). To this day, I have no idea what they thought might have happened. Well, if you have not read any chemistry books, what would you make of such an experience?
†I had somewhat underestimated the drying time, and so had to leave the school laboratory for my next lesson. About halfway through the next laboratory class, the new set of students started to be alarmed by the loud cracks coming from the water-pump gutter running down the middle of the laboratory bench. More to the point, the teacher did not know how to stop these noises, which continued to punctuate the rest of his class. To describe him as annoyed at the end of that class is putting it mildly. At least, he HAD read some chemistry textbooks.
References
- H. Hartl, and D. Ullrich, "Die Kristallstruktur von Stickstofftrijodid‐1‐Pyridin NJ<sub>3</sub> · C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>N", Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie, vol. 409, pp. 228-236, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19744090212
- R. Hagedorn, H. Pritzkow, and J. Jander, "<i>N</i>-Iododimethylamine", Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Crystallography and Crystal Chemistry, vol. 33, pp. 3209-3210, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0567740877010565
Halogen bonds: Part 1.
November 29th, 2014Halogen bonds are less familiar cousins to hydrogen bonds. They are defined as non-covalent interactions (NCI) between a halogen atom (X, acting as a Lewis acid, in accepting electrons) and a Lewis base D donating electrons; D….X-A vs D…H-A. They are superficially surprising, since both D and X look like electron rich species. In fact the electron distribution around X-X (A=X) is highly anisotropic, with the electron rich distribution (the “donor”) being in a torus encircling the bond, and an electron deficient region (the “acceptor”) lying along the axis of the bond.
I will start this simple exploration of halogen bonds by a crystal structure search, defined as below, where A in the above definition is also any halogen, the donor D is a tri-alkyl nitrogen donating via a lone pair, the green contact is defined as an intermolecular distance equal to or shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii together with an angle subtended as N…7A…7A.
The result of such a search is shown below:
There are surprises.
This next search replaces A with a carbon instead of a halogen. The hot-spot moves to ~2.8Å, still much shorter than the combined van der Waals radii, and there are rather more hits this time.‡
I will next start with a simple exploration of how the electron density on I2 changes when it accepts an electron from a donor D (ωB97XD/Def2-TZVPP-PP calculation). The following is an electron density difference isosurface (0.002au) showing how the density changes. The red phase is increased density, which adds exo to the bond, and the blue is decreased density, mostly at the iodine atom but also in the centre of the bond. These changes have axial symmetry along the axis of the I-I bond.
As usual, if you want to view a 3D model of this surface, click on the graphic above.
This next difference map shows the inverse, i.e. what happens when an electron is removed from I2 to form a radical cation. Again blue shows decreased density, and this is not axially symmetric, coming from the π-system (more specifically just one of the π-MOs; the orthogonal π-manifold actually gains red density). This is a nice way of showing that I2 accepts electrons into the σ-manifold and looses them from the π-manifold. In other words, the density responds in a very anisotropic way to addition or loss of electrons.†
In part 2, I will focus on one of the examples, HEKZOO[1] as published in 2012[2]. This is a complex between the base DABCO and molecular iodine, in which the DABCO donates electrons into that I2 σ-manifold.
‡There are only three significant hits with D=di-alkyloxygen rather than nitrogen. The first two[3],[4] involve X-A=I-I with a D…X distance of 2.8Aring; and the third X-A=Cl-Cl.
†I have now added also the density difference map for the base DABCO as a model for the donor D. Note that for this base, when an electron is lost to form the radical cation, the density reduces not just at the nitrogen lone pairs, but also the adjacent C-C bonds.
This post is the first I have written since hearing the very sad news about the death of Paul Schleyer. He was a frequent commentator on these posts, and his towering presence over the last sixty years in chemistry will be sorely missed.
References
Tags: crystal structure search, D. Note, frequent commentator, Paul Schleyer
Posted in crystal_structure_mining, Interesting chemistry, reaction mechanism | No Comments »